Day One - 13 October 2026

10:00 am - 10:30 am EST How Just Eat Takeaway got to AI-powered voice ordering by empowering colleagues to build backend solutions first

James Osborn - Senior Director, AI & Data, Just Eat Takeaway.com

Just Eat shows how building on strong foundations lets you do both the glamorous innovation work and the high-value automation work, unlocking the real promise of AI on multiple fronts at once.

By picking targeted areas and scaling successes to a shared platform, Just Eat focused on ensuring key systems were available for integration with all flavours of AI agents and workflows. From Customer Service to partner-side processes, and internal tooling that lets colleagues build what they need on the shared platform, available to all roles and functions. By empowering users from finance, legal and other areas to build, they no longer have to wait at the end of an engineering backlog.

That groundwork is what made a consumer voice assistant, to help customers in the discovery phase, a reasonable next step. James Osborn, Senior Director of AI & Data at Just Eat, traces the line from back-office automation to voice ordering running across European markets, explaining what each layer had to be capable of before the next one was attempted. He closes on what the internal work gave Just Eat Takeaway that a standalone voice project would not: employees who already knew how to build with these tools.

Key takeaways

  • Which internal and partner-side automation needs to be working before a customer-facing agent is realistic
  • How a shared AI platform lets non-engineering teams solve problems engineers were never going to reach
  • What Just Eat gained by sequencing capability instead of starting with the visible thing

img

James Osborn

Senior Director, AI & Data
Just Eat Takeaway.com

10:30 am - 11:00 am EST Beyond deflection: What it really takes to trust AI agents

Greg Johnson - Head of NA Customer Success, LuxCreo
Sam Chandler - Director, Customer Success, Commercial, Kustomer

AI Agents are moving from pilot projects to daily operations, but most CX teams are still unsure where the line between hype and real capability sits. This session cuts through the noise to unpack what's actually working: which use cases are ready for autonomous handling today, which still need a human in the loop, and how leading teams build the trust and control needed to scale AI safely.

This is a practical look at real deployment decisions, based on LuxCreo's case study: pairing deterministic guardrails with predictive reasoning so AI Agents follow policy while still handling nuance, using unified customer data to turn a scripted bot into an agent that can actually resolve issues, and measuring ROI beyond deflection rate alone. Attendees will leave with a framework for evaluating their own AI Agent readiness and a clear-eyed view of where the technology actually sits today.

Attendees will learn:

  • How to identify which CX workflows are ready for autonomous AI Agent handling today, and which still need a human in the loop
  • Concrete examples of AI Agents resolving issues end-to-end (processing a return, updating an order, issuing refunds) without a human needing to step in
  • How to measure AI Agent ROI beyond deflection rate, using real numbers from a live production deployment




img

Greg Johnson

Head of NA Customer Success
LuxCreo

img

Sam Chandler

Director, Customer Success, Commercial
Kustomer

Consumers measure every brand against the best experience they have ever had anywhere. Their expectations continue to rise, shaped by the AI they use in their daily lives: AI that remembers them, understands their history, and finishes the job in one pass. 

Organizations are adopting AI at a rapid pace, adding more automation, more copilots, more point solutions. Yet the gap between what customers expect and what systems actually deliver keeps widening. Most organizations are not short on data or tools. They are short on contextual intelligence, the ability to bring scattered context together in the moment and act on it.

The problem isn't that organizations aren't deploying AI. The main problem is the organization's operating model โ€“ how work actually gets done. While organizations have evolved to an AI-assisted model, with automation handling routine tasks, people remain central to every decision. The organization's real context, such as purchase history, open cases and prior interactions, stays scattered across disconnected systems, unable to be activated in the moment. 

The answer? An agentic operating model, one where AI, people, data and systems are coordinated in real time around outcomes rather than managed as isolated tools. Attendees will see how connecting and compounding context from every interaction changes what is possible, understand the technical and organizational steps to get there, and walk away confident about success in the agentic era.

Attendees will learn:

  • Why the AI-assisted operating model, where automation and copilots make existing processes more efficient, hits a ceiling, and what distinguishes it from a true agentic operating model built around outcomes.
  • How activating the context an organization already has, across systems, channels and customer history, turns every interaction into intelligence that improves the next one.
  • How a unified CX platform that can access context across the entirety of the customer journey is key to successfully adopting the agentic operating model. 




img

Allison Castelot

Director, Product Marketing
Genesys

img

Rebecca Roberts

Senior Director, Product Marketing
Genesys

Gartner estimates that only around 130 of the thousands of vendors that claim to sell agentic AI are genuinely agentic โ€“ hence the "agent washing" phenomenon, in which chatbots and RPA are rebranded as "agentic AI". The CX Network Advisory Board has said similar - "too many tools and too much hype". This manifests in practitioners spending lots of time investigating tools that were never suitable in the first place.
 
Fernanda Souza evaluates AI vendors for an organization delivering essential infrastructure and public services across the UK, and her opening question is never "is this product agentic?"  Andreas Welsch was with SAP for years before going independent, and he argues that the industry's refusal to openly discussed what has actually been deployed leaves CX teams unable to benchmark against other teams. In this panel discussion, our speakers will address how to judge whether an AI agent belongs near customers when vendors are often cagey about questions and peers wont discuss what has worked.  
 
This session will give attendees a way to separate the wheat from the chaff. We'll lay out a clear ladder of autonomy, from scripted to autonomous, and explain what each level can actually deliver to answer not "is this truly agentic?" and instead "which level of autonomy do I need?" We will also provide advice on the right questions to ask in demos and make a case that workflows aren't worse than AI agents โ€“ just suited to different tasks.
 
Attendees will learn:
  • What are the four levels of autonomy and what can each deliver for CX?
  • The questions to ask vendors during demos to ascertain if the product is genuinely agentic or a rebranded chatbot.
  • How to recognize use cases for AI agents and know when a more traditional workflow is more appropriate 

img

Andreas Welsch

Founder & Chief Human Agentic AI Officer
Intelligence Briefing

img

Fernanda Souza

AI & Innovation Lead
Amey

12:00 pm - 12:30 pm EST What happens when the AI agent is wrong?

Hemang Upadhyay - Sr. Manager - Product Management (AI), LG Electronics
Everyone loves an AI-related PR disaster, as long as it isn't happening to them. Customer-facing AI carries real risk and even more perceived risk. Much of that risk starts with something ordinary. Two systems hold different answers, or one of them was never updated when the policy changed. A person spots the mismatch and knows which system to trust. An agent doesn't, and answers confidently anyway. When it gets that wrong, the damage is reputational, legal and financial, so plenty of leaders are still sceptical.

This session treats a wrong answer as a design problem, not an inevitability, and makes the case for a recovery layer built in at the start of a
deployment. A recovery layer catches failed interactions before the customer complains, shows which data or rule produced the answer, escalates with the context attached, puts the customer's outcome right quickly, and feeds what it learns back into the guardrails
so the same failure is less likely to happen twice.

Hemang Upadhyay has spent 16 years building enterprise AI, digital commerce and product data governance systems, and is currently Senior Manager for AI Product Management at LG Electronics as well as a member of CX Network's Advisory Board. Drawing from his experience across his career, he'll show how to design a recovery layer, and why CX teams can't do it alone.

Attendees will learn:
  • What a recovery layer looks like in practice, and how it catches failures before customers report them
  • Which three roles every AI journey needs named (process owner, data owner and recovery owner) and what each one answers for
  • How to score the journeys you already have live, and why recovery quality says more about customer trust than containment rate does
img

Hemang Upadhyay

Sr. Manager - Product Management (AI)
LG Electronics

12:30 pm - 1:00 pm EST The rise of agentic AI: Trust, control, and the North American consumer

Michael Nevski - Former Director, Global Insights, Visa

Agentic AI is arriving faster than consumers can name it. According to the April 2026 Agentic AI Usage and Perception study, while almost every North American recognises AI and more than a third already use it, 60% have never heard of agentic AI and just 3% have used it.

Drawing on that research, Michael Nevski, former Director, Global Insights at Visa, unpacks the gap between curiosity and usage. Consumers hold hope and hesitation at once, with a majority believing AI will improve their lives but also holding concerns around it. That reluctance appears to be negotiable, with interest in AI shopping assistants increasing significantly.

The session will reveal and analyse the results of the major study, led by Nevski, and closes with a practical view of which customers adopt first, which safeguards move the needle, and where accountability lies when an AI agent makes a mistake.

Attendees will learn:

  • A data-backed picture of agentic AI awareness, sentiment, and intent across generations and income levels
  • The specific categories and tasks consumers will hand to an agent first - and the ones they won't
  • Design and disclosure choices that convert hesitation into adoption

img

Michael Nevski

Former Director, Global Insights
Visa